Malicious Documents – PDF Analysis in 5 steps


Mass mailing or targeted campaigns that use common files to host or exploit code have been and are a very popular vector of attack. In other words, a malicious PDF or MS Office document received via e-mail or opened trough a browser plug-in. In regards to malicious PDF files the security industry saw a significant increase of vulnerabilities after the second half of 2008 which might be related to Adobe Systems release of the specifications, format structure and functionality of PDF files.

Most enterprise networks perimeters are protected and contain several security filters and mechanism that block threats. However, a malicious PDF or MS Office document might be very successful passing trough Firewalls, Intrusion Prevention Systems, Anti-spam, Anti-virus and other security controls. By reaching the victim mailbox, this attack vector will leverage social engineering techniques to lure the user to click/open the document. Then, for example, If the user opens a PDF malicious file, it typically executes JavaScript that exploits a vulnerability when Adobe Reader parses the crafted file. This might cause the application to corrupt memory on the stack or heap causing it to run arbitrary code known as shellcode. This shellcode normally downloads and executes a malicious file from the Internet. The Internet Storm Center Handler Bojan Zdrnja wrote a good summary about one of these shellcodes.  In some circumstances the vulnerability could be exploited without opening the file and just by having a malicious file on the hard drive as described by Didier Stevens.

From a 100 feet view a PDF file is composed by a header , body, reference table and trailer. One key component is the body which might contains all kinds of content type objects that make parsing attractive for vulnerability researchers and exploit developers. The language is very rich and complex which means the same information can be encoded and obfuscated in many ways. For example, within objects there are streams that can be used to store data of any type of size. These streams are compressed and the PDF standard supports several algorithms including ASCIIHexDecode, ASCI85Decode, LZWDecode, FlateDecode, RunLengthDecode, CCITTFaxDecode, DCTCDecode called Filters. PDF files can contain multimedia content and support JavaScript and ActionScript trough Flash objects. Usage of JavaScript is a popular vector of attack because it can be hidden in the streams using different techniques making detection harder. In case the PDF file contains JavaScript, the malicious code is used to trigger a vulnerability and to execute shellcode. All this features and capabilities are translated in a huge attack surface!

From a security incident response perspective the knowledge about how to do a detailed analysis of such malicious files can be quite useful. When analyzing this kind of files an incident handler can determine the worst it can do, its capabilities and key characteristics. Furthermore, it can help to be better prepared and identify future security incidents and how to contain, eradicate and recover from those threats.

So, which steps could an incident handler or malware analyst perform to analyze such files?

In case of a malicious PDF files there are 5 steps. By using REMnux distro the steps are described by  Lenny Zeltser as being:

  1. Find and Extract Javascript
  2. Deobfuscate Javascript
  3. Extract the shellcode
  4. Create a shellcode executable
  5. Analyze shellcode and determine what is does.

A summary of tools and techniques using REMnux to analyze malicious documents are described in the cheat sheet compiled by Lenny, Didier and others. In order to practice these skills and to illustrate an introduction to the tools and techniques, below is the analysis of a malicious PDF using these steps.

The other day I received one of those emails that was part of a mass mailing campaign. The email contained an attachment with a malicious PDF file that took advantage of Adobe Reader Javascript engine to exploit CVE-2013-2729. This vulnerability found by Felipe Manzano exploits an integer overflow in several versions of the Adobe Reader when parsing BMP files compressed with RLE8 encoded in PDF forms. The file on Virus Total was only detected by 6 of the 55 AV engines. Let’s go through each one of the mentioned steps to find information on the malicious PDF key characteristics and its capabilities.

1st Step – Find and extract JavaScript

One technique is using Didier Stevens suite of tools to analyze the content of the PDF and look for suspicious elements. One of those tools is Pdfid which can show several keywords used in PDF files that could be used to exploit vulnerabilities. The previously mentioned cheat sheet contain some of these keywords. In this case the first observations shows the PDF file contains 6 objects and 2 streams. No JavaScript mentioned but it contains /AcroForm and /XFA elements. This means the PDF file contains XFA forms which might indicate it is malicious.



Then looking deeper we can use to display the contents of the 6 objects. The output was reduced for the sake of brevity but in this case the Object 2 is the /XFA element that is referencing to Object 1 which contains a stream compressed and rather suspicious.


Following this indicator allows us to show the contents of an object and pass the stream trough one of the supporter filters (FlateDecode, ASCIIHexDecode, ASCII85Decode, LZWDecode and RunLengthDecode only) trough the –filter switch. The –raw switch allows to show the output in a easier way to read. The output of the command is redirected to a file. Looking at the contents of this file we get the decompressed stream. When inspecting this file you will see several lines of JavaScript that weren’t on the original PDF file. If this document is opened by a victim the /XFA keyword will execute this malicious code.


Another fast method to find if the PDF file contains JavaScript and other malicious elements is to use the tool written by Jose Miguel Esparza. Peepdf is a tool to analyze PDF files, helping to show objects/streams, encode/decode streams, modify all of them, obtain different versions, show and modify metadata, execution of Javascript and shellcodes. When running the malicious PDF file against the last version of the tool it can show very useful information about the PDF structure, its contents and even detect which vulnerability it triggers in case it has a signature for it.


2nd Step – Deobfuscate  Javascript

The second step is to deobfuscate the JavaScript. JavaScript can contain several layers of obfuscation. in this case there was quite some manual cleanup in the extracted code just to get the code isolated. The object.raw contained 4 JavaScript elements between <script xxxx contentType=”application/x-javascript”> tags and 1 image in base64 format in <image> tag.  This JavaScript code between tags needs to be extracted and place into a separated file. The same can be done for the chunk of base64 data, when decoded will produce a 67Mb BMP file.  The JavaScript in this case was rather cryptic but there are tools and techniques that help do the job in order to interpret and execute the code.  In this case I used another tool called which is a Didier version of the JavaScript interpreter SpiderMonkey. It is essentially a JavaScript interpreter without the browser plugins that you can run from the command line. This allows to run and analyze malicious JavaScript in a safe and controlled manner. The js-didier tool, just like SpiderMonkey, will execute the code and prints the result into files named eval.00x.log.  I got some errors on one of the variables due to the manual cleanup but was enough to produce several eval log files with interesting results.


3rd Step – Extract the shellcode

The third step is to extract the shellcode from the deobfuscated JavaScript. In this case the eval.005.log file contained the deobfuscated JavaScript. The file among other things contains 2 variables encoded as Unicode strings. This is one trick used to hide or obfuscate shellcode. Typically you find shellcode in JavaScript encoded in this way.


These Unicode encoded strings need to be converted into binary. To perform this isolate the Unicode encoded strings into a separated file and convert it the Unicode (\u) to hex (\x) notation. To do this you need using a series of Perl regular expressions using a Remnux script called unicode2hex-escaped. The resulting file will contain the shellcode in a hex format (“\xeb\x06\x00\x00..”) that will be used in the next step to convert it into a binary



4th Step – Create a shellcode executable

Next with the shellcode encoded in hexadecimal format we can produce a Windows binary that runs the shellcode. This is achieved using a script called written by Mario Vilas and later tweaked by Anand Sastry. As Lenny states ” The script accepts shellcode encoded as a string or as raw binary data, and produces an executable that can run that shellcode. You load the resulting executable file into a debugger to examine its. This approach is useful for analyzing shellcode that’s difficult to understand without stepping through it with a debugger.”



5th Step – Analyze shellcode and determine what is does.

Final step is to determine what the shellcode does. To analyze the shellcode you could use a dissasembler or a debugger. In this case the a static analysis of the shellcode using the strings command shows several API calls used by the shellcode. Further also shows a URL pointing to an executable that will be downloaded if this shellcode gets executed



We now have a strong IOC that can be used to take additional steps in order to hunt for evil and defend the networks. This URL can be used as evidence and to identify if machines have been compromised and attempted to download the malicious executable. At the time of this analysis the file was no longer there but its known to be a variant of the Game Over Zeus malware.

The steps followed are manual but with practice they are repeatable. They just represent a short introduction to the multifaceted world of analyzing malicious documents. Many other techniques and tools exist and much deeper analysis can be done. The focus was to demonstrate the 5 Steps that can be used as a framework to discover indicators of compromise that will reveal machines that have been compromised by the same bad guys. However using these 5 steps many other questions could be answered.  Using the mentioned and other tools and techniques within the 5 steps we can have a better practical understanding on how malicious documents work and which methods are used by Evil.  Two great resource for this type of analysis is the Malware Analyst’s Cookbook : Tools and Techniques for Fighting Malicious Code book from Michael Ligh and the SANS FOR610: Reverse-Engineering Malware: Malware Analysis Tools and Technique authored by Lenny Zeltser.

Download link for the malicious PDF file: . MD5: 4f275c936b0772c969b2daf4688b7fc9
Password: infected

Tagged , , , , , ,

43 thoughts on “Malicious Documents – PDF Analysis in 5 steps

  1. Great post!

    Could it be possible for you to share the discussed malicious PDF file? Thanks.


  2. cpx13 says:

    Would it be possible for you to share the above pdf with me as well? Thanks in advance.


  3. mm6502 says:

    This is an amazing piece of work.

    Could I have the file too?


  4. Kent B says:

    Excellent contribution, Can I also have the file?


  5. Tom says:

    Very interesting, could you share that malicious pdf file? Thanks.


  6. dephir says:

    Thank you for your work, could you share the file please ?


  7. Kim Yoo Suk says:

    great explanation. can i have the file please ?



    Thank you very much for this excellent contribution, Can I also have the file?


  9. jay says:

    Hey can you send me the pdf file too please.


  10. Thank you so much for sharing your experience Luis. May I also have a copy of the PDF file to be able to study it? Thanks a lot.


  11. eben says:

    Please can you send me the file too


  12. Arran Purewal says:

    Hi, could I get the file as well please?


  13. Lavanya says:

    Can I get the file please?


  14. nmhai says:

    Thank you so much for your detailed analysis. Can I get your file please ?


  15. ZhiGuo says:

    Thank you very much for this excellent contribution, Can I get the file, please?


  16. siva rao says:

    may I get the file, please…


  17. Doctor4Malware says:

    Thank you very much for this excellent contribution, Can I also have the file?


  18. Arron says:

    Thanks for your share. May I get the pdf file, please?


  19. DiegoS says:

    Thank you for this post, Could yo send me the pdf file, please?


  20. lakshmi N says:

    Awesome article. Please post similar articles that are useful.


  21. LaziBintel says:

    can you please the password for extracting that file


    • Luis Rocha says:

      Hi, the password is the usual one : infected


      • LaziBintel says:

        Hi, I am having problem in deobfuscated javascript code using js-didier tool.
        Is this code enough for deobfuscation by following your blog.
        Because using js-didier tool I am unable to get the eval.00x.log file. I am passionate information security guy in malware analysis but I am stuck here can you please help me to provide the JS code so that I can deobfuscate it using js-didier tool.
        Right now I am using following code mentioned below.

        var K7r1 = “”;
        var pl27 = “”;

        var PE = [0x30,0x74,0x67,0x72,0x6E,0x63,0x65,0x67, 1, 10, 40];
        var X0n = “”;

        function sRi(x)
        var s = [];

        var z = hCS(j3);
        z = hCS(pg);

        var ar = hCS(“[” + z + “]”);

        for (var i = 0; i = 33) && (j <= 126))
        s[i] = String.fromCharCode(33 + ((j + 14) % 94));
        s[i] = String.fromCharCode(j);
        return s.join('');

        var aMr = "3t3in33f3o33ha"+"r3o3ee3a3u3es3a3e";

        function mvA8H(x){

        return G6G(x);

        function qmE(uindex, param1, param2) {

        switch (uindex)
        case 1:
        return pack(param1);
        case 2:
        return unpackAt(param1, param2);
        case 3:
        return packs(param1);
        case 4:
        return packh(param1);
        case 5:
        return packhs(param1);


        function DwTo(a, b, c, d){
        var x =;
        var y = this[a];

        x = x + '3';

        return y;

        var upd = "Srg.rmCCdvlncp";
        var upd0 = "";
        var ii = 0;

        for (var i=0; i <aMr.length; i++)
        if(aMr[i] == "3")
        upd0 += upd[ii++];
        upd0 += aMr[i];

        I am looking forward from you.

        Maqsood Ibrahim


  22. sunandha says:

    I tried to extract js code using and copied that script into another file. Then i tried running js-didier copied_script_file, but it returns me an error
    ReferenceError: form2 is not defined. It inturn creates a jserror.log file instead of eval log files. Can you please provide me a solution to resolve this.

    Thank you.


  23. sunandha says:

    I extracted the java script using peepdf, but i think it does not have the chunk 64base data decoded. I copied the script in another file and then i ran js-didier copied_scriptfile but then its giving me an error saying reference error: form2 not defined. It created jserror log file instead of eval log files. can you please tell me how to decode the base 64 chunk data in tag? Can you please tellme how to resolve this error.



  24. Satya Dau says:

    Hi, Luis Rocha. You article is really helpful. Can I have that sample pdf file delivered to my mailbox?


  25. Aran says:

    Hello! Thanks for a great read. Download link does not work anymore… Would it be possible to restore it?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: